Saturday, April 30, 2011



Don’t bitch later that the Republican Teahadists destroyed your benefits

Attend a Local Town Hall


Bring your camera to a local town hall in your area and report back to us on what you see by e-mailing us at rapidresponse@dccc.org.

You can also print out a pledge card and ask your Member of Congress to declare their opposition to benefit cuts.
8.5" x 11" (PDF) | 21" x 36" (PDF)

Can't make it to a town hall?
Use our online form to send a letter to your Member of Congress >>






This is a brand new meme to display all those beautiful, funny, crazy and even those that make you think book covers you come across each week. I don't know about the rest of you, but I love looking at different book covers.






For this weekends Cover Art, I had to share Lori Foster's When You Dare.

This book is the start of a new series, my review will be up on Tuesday, May 24 as part of the blog tour.
The abs on this book cover had me sold!



Every woman dreams of landing an Alpha male. With chiseled cheek bones and tan skin, his strong physique gives off a powerful, masculine vibe. But he saves his quiet, romantic side for his soul mate.










As if the hot cover isn't enough, here's the trailer. This is what I call good marketing!




I've been rendered speechless...lol.



Enjoy your weekend everyone. I've got some reviews coming next week.


I'll be walking in the March of Dimes tomorrow morning to help raise money for research for premature babies. I hope we have nice weather, with no rain. I'm looking forward to the walk.


See you all on Monday ;)





Governor Snyder

Now the Governor can actually appoint an administrator who will have unlimited powers.


It has already started in Michigan where they now have a new amazingly undemocratic ruse where if a municipality is in financial trouble then the Governor can send in “an administrator” who will oversee everything and have unlimited power. Gone will be the mayor, the city manager, all the councilmen and it is a black eye on democracy.

The appointed administrator can be any person the Governor chooses to appoint, or can be a corporation. That’s right, the Governor can simply fire an elected official and appoint any corporation he chooses to take over control. Once appointed the administrator has the power to do anything they need in the name of economic stability. This means an appointed corporation can void collective bargaining agreements, void contracts, dissolve school boards, town councils, and even unincorporate the town.

Even more worrysome is the fact that residents get absolutely no say any any of these decisions.

And it just begun in Benton Harbor.

“Gov. Snyder's plan is the same kind of flagrantly undemocratic "emergency rule" used by military dictators to oppose any semblance of democratic opposition to their policies. While no one expects Gov. Snyder will be rounding up dissidents any time soon, the fight in Michigan is NOT about unions; the governor is attempting to wrest from the hands of every citizen of the state of Michigan, the right to determine who governs at the consent of the governed.

His plan declares an immediate end (with no projected restoration) to the founding principle of our democracy: that public officials may govern ONLY at the consent of the governed.

There is no moral, philosophical, legal or practical justification for Gov. Snyder's claim that a "budget emergency" gives him the right or the power to order the suspension of electoral democracy in his state. Those who support his radical agenda will argue that this is not what they intend, that they are merely trying to be "expedient". This is always the argument of statist profiteers who seek to centralize power; this was the argument of Italy's fascists.

The process which allows the people to govern their government is absolutely sacrosanct in our democracy. There is no way for us to be the free society we claim to be, if that process does not remain sacrosanct. The budgetary discomfort and long, difficult days of work that some public officials might face given budgetary discomfort, are absolutely not a justification for eliminating the democratic process or establishing unilateral executive rule.” - http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/03/08/954169/-Michigan-Governor-Seeks-Emergency-Powers

KEEP VOTING FOR REPUBLICANS AMERICA…YOU ARE VOTING FOR TOTALITARIANISM!

Friday, April 29, 2011



I learned something I didn't know thanks to the royal wedding .... there's a statue of Óscar Romero, along with those of nine other 20th century martyrs, above the Great West Door of Westminster Abbey ....

In 1998 ten vacant statue niches at the West Gate were filled with 10 representative 20th Century martyrs: Grand Duchess Elizabeth of Russia (d.1918), Manche Masemola (d.1928), Maximilian Kolbe (d.1941), Lucian Tapiede (d.1941), Dietrich Bonhoeffer (d.1945), Esther John (d.1960), Martin Luther King (d.1968), Wang Zhiming (d.1973), Janani Luwum (d.1977), and Óscar Romero (d.1980).


- Romero is 6th from the left

Westminster Abbey is an interesting place. Here below is a clip from a BBC documentary on Westminster Abbey, in which the narrator, playwright Alan Bennett, mentions some of the "members of the awkward squad" who are buried there.




Peter"Kid Chocolate"Quillin just got his Underground Clown logo shirts in time for his fight later on tonite in Vegas. Good luck

Tonight on Telefutura undefeated super-middleweight prospect Peter Quillin will take on top-10 contender Jesse Brinkley in a 10-round main event at 11:30 PM ET. The grizzled Brinkley, 35-6, 22 KO’s, is a spoiler that recently came up in a bid for a title this past October against I.B.F champ Lucian Bute. The heavy-handed “Kid Chocolate” Quillin, 23-0, 17 KO’s, is looking to make a statement in the biggest fight of his career.





I hope the title of today's post doesn't offend anyone. If it does, I apologize. It's Friday, It's been a long week and I wanted to post something with a little 'oomph' to it.



Today I wanted to discuss my favorite female villains in literature.


Villains are what makes the story 'pop'. Without the villains, the heroes would have nothing to do. The story would be boring without the bad guys or girls.

In no particular order, here are my favorite female villains in books. These are the ladies that we love to hate. They are ferocious, wicked and smart and these are the type of ladies no one wants to mess with. You go girls!






Scarlett O'Hara in Gone With the Wind


She is the ultimate brat, catty and spoiled, a smart business woman. What Scarlett wants, she gets. She lets nothing and no one get in her way. She'll even stoop as low as to steal her sisters fiancee in order to pay the bills. In a time when women were expected to sit home looking pretty, Scarlett was out running her own business.









Vittoria in the Twilight series

This vampire is on a mission to avenge her lovers death. Can you blame her for wanting to kill Bella? I sure don't.

I enjoyed seeing Vittoria being brought to life on the big screen. Those running scenes were pretty awesome.









Annie Wilkes in Misery

This psycho nurse is obsessed with her favorite author. She stops at nothing to keep him in her home so he can finish his book and give it the ending she always wanted. When she hobbles Paul, I cringed while reading.








The Wicked Witch of the West in The Wizard of Oz

This witch is the ultimate meany. As a child, I was scared stiff by her.
What's more terrifying than a green witch and her flying monkeys?

In the film she's got one of my favorite death scenes.

"I'm melting....what a world, what a world....."









Miranda Priestly in The Devil Wears Prada

This lady is an ice queen, a cut-throat, shrewd business woman.
And she always looks friggin' fantastic.








Bellatrix in the Harry Potter series

This witch literally made me scream while reading. What an awful, demented woman! Truth be told, she belongs in an insane asylum.








Anne Boleyn in The Other Boleyn Girl

I saved the best for last since Anne Boleyn was a real person.

Full of ambition, Anne paid the ultimate price.
They say she seduced the king and convinced him to annul his own marriage to Queen Catherine. He soon tired of her and had her beheaded. King Henry wrote Anne 17 love letters that are preserved in the Vatican library today.





Those are a few of my favorites, who are your favorite villainesses a.k.a. bitches in literature? I wonder, if some of these characters were nicer, would they have gotten as far in life??

Enjoy your weekend! I'll be back next week with more book reviews and randomness.



Amazingly, there is no accountability on the part of Republicans and they keep pushing for even more tax cuts for the wealthy.

It makes absolutely no sense that our country has to borrow money to pay for the tax cuts for the very wealthy. The old, tired argument that taxes should not be raised during a recession because it takes money out of circulation and also the other excuse: the uncertainty for the rich and the corporations are causing them to hold back on investments.

I would like for somebody to explain to me why the corporations are realizing record profits…if the uncertainty is so bad it has not stopped them from using money our government gave them to loan to the public and they turn around instead and use it for speculation and gamble with it.

I want to understand but I can’t; why is it that if the elimination of regulations and the lowering of taxes on the rich and corporations creates jobs and prosperity…prosperity for whom? We saw this happen through the Bush years and eventually our economy banked, the stock market crashed and millions of Americans lost their jobs. So is this idea to help the rich so that somehow, miraculously it will be re-invested and it will filter on down to the middle class and the poor…it doesn’t happen and it never will. We have to make them face the truth about TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS…it didn’t work and it never will.

Dave Johnson explains it very well:

A brief budget history since the 80's: We cut taxes, increased military spending and cut investment in our infrastructure, and the result was huge budget deficits and slower economic growth. Then in the 90's we raised taxes on the rich and increased investment in the country and we had big budget surpluses and the economy was growing at a good clip. Then in the 00's we again cut taxes on the rich and raised military spending and cut back on investing in the country, and went back to huge deficits ("incredibly positive news'') and feeble economic growth culminating in the financial crash.

So now, to address the Reagan/Bush deficits the DC elites -- the "serious people" -- are proposing ... wait for it ... not raising taxes on the rich, not cutting military spending and not investing in the country. Instead they want to cut back more on the safety net and on services for the middle class. There really is a brain disease loose in DC.

The justification for DC's refusal to fix a problem caused by tax cuts on the rich by restoring taxes on the rich is that you can't raise taxes on the rich during a recession. The oft-repeated idea that taxes "take money out of the economy" has become so ingrained that there is no discussion at all, it is just accepted as a given. It is "conventional wisdom." It certainly is a convenient conventional wisdom for the wealthy, but it is a fact?

Conclusion: Raising taxes on the rich will not slow the economy. In fact, every indication is that it tax cuts on the rich hurt the economy. So the real question is, why aren't these "deficit commissions" proposing that we fix a deficit problem that was caused by tax cuts for the rich by raising taxes on the rich back to where they were before the problem? It is clearly time to stop the "riverboat gamble" and restore pre-Reagan top tax rates.

MAKE REPUBLICANS ACCOUNTABLE, MAKE THE WEALTHY PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE, PENALIZE CORPORATIONS WHO TAKE JOBS OVERSEAS, ELIMINATE ALL THOSE SUBSIDIES FOR VERY PROSPEROUS OIL COMPANIES.

ONE MORE THING: STOP SABOTAGING THE PRESIDENT, IT IS HURTING AMERICA!


Thursday, April 28, 2011

I liked this post by Bryan Cones at US Catholic - Why I won't be watching the JPII beatification blowout. Here's part of it ....

After reading John Allen's third thousand-word Q&A post on the beatification of Pope John Paul II, I can't decide what I'm more sick of: the "royal wedding" or the beatification of JPII. Neither really has anything to do with my life, since I'm not British or a monarchist, and the way the Catholic church does it, I'm never going to be canonized either .......

Pope John Paul II was a fine man, heroic even in some ways, as I noted in my May column, but I think we need another 50 years or so before we make him a saint--regardless of how many miracles he pulls off in the meantime. As another writer noted at NCR, doing it now could be interpreted as a way of propping up the papal monarchy, analogous to the royal wedding ........



UPDATE: Flowchart: Should You Pay Attention to the Royal Wedding? :)

Nope, I'm not interested in the upcoming royal wedding but it's hard to go anywhere online without seeing stuff about it, and today when I saw an article I really disliked, I decided to post some of it along with a bit of another different article I'd seen at Feminist Philosophers.

First, here's some of the one I disliked, at America magazine's blog, The ghosts at the royal wedding by Austen Ivereigh, which manages to combine romanticism, bigotry, and a jab at the Church of England .....

[...] At the heart of tomorrow's ceremony is a winning combination of elements which film-makers strive after: on the one hand, what is totally "other" -- a dreamy, fairy-tale setting: the marriage of a prince, the making of a princess -- with what, on the other, is universal and human: boy meets girl; they fall in love; they marry.

And as some bishops have already been pointing out, what happens tomorrow is a great tribute to the institution of marriage -- the union of a man and a woman for the purpose of creating and rearing children. There are many "alternatives" to that model around us -- same-sex unions, single parents, divorced couples -- and advocates of equality would want us to be believe they are all equally valid. But they aren't. History, research and experience all point to a stable, loving marriage between a man and a woman as the best possible environment for a child -- measured by almost any outcome .....

The ghost at tomorrow's banquet, indeed, is that, for all each has sought to blend itself with the age, both the Church of England and the monarchy are deeply rooted in an historical moment when the British nation was born -- a Protestant island besieged. And they continue to be defined by that moment, and to need each other to be so defined. The moment is frozen in the laws. The Act of Settlement of 1701 ... a Roman Catholic is specifically excluded from succession ... Now watch the Church of England squirm ....


And now, to gain a little perspective, here's a bit of the other post, Kate's Kismet by Gail Dines at Counterpunch .....

For the last few months my British accent has been the bane of my life. Let me explain. Everywhere I go in this country I am accosted by locals asking me for details on the royal wedding. As if a lefty Jew from the north of England would have any inside knowledge of the workings of the English upper-class long known for their anti-Semitism and love of all things Conservative .....

Kate is certainly going to be turned into a princess on her wedding day, and given the track record of how the royal family treats its women, she should be anything but thrilled at the prospect. Should she decide not to play the game of loyal royal wife, then she need only look to Diana or Sarah Ferguson to see her future .....

The British and American press have run stories about the way William’s friends make fun of Kate for coming from a family that has actually had to work for a living. Evidently especially humorous is that fact her mother was once a flight attendant. William’s family is the richest welfare family in the world yet you won’t hear David Cameron attacking them for being lazy freeloaders .....




Unbeaten prospect Peter “Kid Chocolate” Quillin (23-0, 17 KOs), will be in Reno for Friday night’s showdown against past world title challenger Jesse Brinkley (35-6, 22 KOs) in the 10 round main event, airing live on Telefutura, for the vacant USBO super middleweight championship. Kid Chocolates team will be rocking The Underground Clown custom for Kid Chocolates team.



If I were the President I would sue Orly Taitz and those who followed her in their injurious allegations.

You see, we do have FREEDOM OF SPEECH in America and you can say almost anything short of yelling “FIRE” in a crowded theater…but injurious, libel, false accusations and lies about a person can ‘t be told without the risk of the injured party bringing a libel law suit against the person who said it.

If the court deemed in the past that Ms. Taitz’ law suits were “FRIVOLOUS” the courts should not stopped there…they should have fined her heavily for consciously lying and defaming the President. As far as Donald Trump is concerned; a vigorous law suit for $500 million dollars should be presented against him. Why? Because he knows that this birth certificate issue is just not fabricated but he is using it to defame and injure the President.

Of course, this is not surprising coming from these fringe-ultra right Republican-Teahadists who can’t win any arguments on facts because they have no grounds; so they attack the President on a personal level…by diminishing his character, his education, his origin they are also fanning the flames of racism…all very injurious not just to President Obama but for America.

PHOTO SOURCE: http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/Orly%2520Taitz_birth%2520certificate%2520forehead.jpg&imgrefurl=http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2010/08/orly_taitz_says_shell_staple_o.php&usg=__pZ9UoLRYWqsecGVcIxrRMI0UfYg=&h=329&w=282&sz=29&hl=en&start=0&sig2=yv2ARSgD-T4lobFENdC10Q&zoom=1&tbnid=949s8Uz_ALTWNM:&tbnh=138&tbnw=118&ei=gnu4TeeGFsrr0gGz4Mz6Dw&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dphotos%2Bof%2Borly%2Btaitz%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX%26biw%3D982%26bih%3D544%26tbm%3Disch%26prmd%3Divnso&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=125&vpy=55&dur=1730&hovh=243&hovw=208&tx=142&ty=83&page=1&ndsp=15&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0


Because this one was not good enough for BIRTHERS


Will this silence them? Nah…they will continue to live in never-never land and since they despise the President so much they will find a way to object or otherwise through Donald Trump or Glenn Beck discredit the disclosure.

I think that it is a sad day in America when the President of the United States is subjected to this kind of baseless, crass and disingenuous scrutiny; IT IS AN INSULT and it is clear it is racially motivated and just as the efforts our President has made to work on a bipartisan, logical, pragmatic way with those who disagree with him and have thrown a wrench on any and all efforts on his part…this too will become a continuing nuisance because birthers will not believe anything even if you were to hit them across the face with a 2X 4.




From http://www.dailykos.com/

Wed Apr 27, 2011

Obama releases long form birth certificate

By Joan McCarter

In the almost certainly futile attempt to put away once and for all questions about his birth, President Obama has released his long form birth certificate.

The President believed the distraction over his birth certificate wasn’t good for the country. It may have been good politics and good TV, but it was bad for the American people and distracting from the many challenges we face as a country. Therefore, the President directed his counsel to review the legal authority for seeking access to the long form certificate and to request on that basis that the Hawaii State Department of Health make an exception to release a copy of his long form birth certificate. They granted that exception in part because of the tremendous volume of requests they had been getting. President Barack Obama's long form birth certificate can be seen here (PDF).....

At a time of great consequence for this country—when we should be debating how we win the future, reduce our deficit, deal with high gas prices, and bring stability to the Middle East, Washington, DC, was once again distracted by a fake issue. The President’s hope is that with this step, we can move on to debating the bigger issues that matter to the American people and the future of the country.

Which is all true. But now that this fuel has been added to the flame, will it stop? Fat chance. From Think Progress, here's the headline from Fox News: "White House Releases What It Says Is The President’s Birth Certificate."

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Check out the video of the UGC company car getting the finishing touches before it hits the streets.


Last week we were asked to suffer with Jesus in his crucifixion - this week of Creighton University's Spiritual Exercises style retreat asks us to share Jesus' joy in his resurrection ...

This week we contemplate, using the Scriptures and our imagination, the experience for Jesus of being raised from the dead and his sharing of that experience with those he loved. What inexpressible joy Jesus must have had at experiencing eternal life, as a human being! Having just experienced the depths of our suffering and death, he now knows what it will be for us to experience the life of the Resurrection. And how he must have delighted in sharing that joy with those who suffered with him at the foot of the cross! .... Finally, I contemplate our risen Lord sharing his joy with me.

The first time I made the retreat, I just didn't understand this week. I had a hard time imagining Jesus being, well, joyful, just as I had had trouble imagining him suffering the week before. I thought God was impassable. It's taken me a while to let Jesus be emotional. It's still a struggle.

I read something the other day, J.R.R. Tolkien and the Significance of Fairy-Story by Andrew Schuman, that touched on joy -

[W]hat Tolkien calls “the Consolation of the Happy Ending.” This consolation ... is a sudden and joyous ‘turn’ that occurs just as all hope is lost, a good catastrophe— eucatastrophe, as Tolkien called it— a “sudden and miraculous grace: never to be counted on to recur.” ..... For Tolkien, eucatas"trophic joy possessed great metaphysical as well as personal significance ... The Resurrection is the eucatastrophe of the story of the Incarnation" ...

So, if I understand this correctly, maybe that kind of joy is like what's found in this Jane Kenyon poem ...

Happiness

There’s just no accounting for happiness,
or the way it turns up like a prodigal
who comes back to the dust at your feet
having squandered a fortune far away.

And how can you not forgive?
You make a feast in honor of what
was lost, and take from its place the finest
garment, which you saved for an occasion
you could not imagine, and you weep night and day
to know that you were not abandoned,
that happiness saved its most extreme form
for you alone.

No, happiness is the uncle you never
knew about, who flies a single-engine plane
onto the grassy landing strip, hitchhikes
into town, and inquires at every door
until he finds you asleep midafternoon
as you so often are during the unmerciful
hours of your despair.

It comes to the monk in his cell.
It comes to the woman sweeping the street
with a birch broom, to the child
whose mother has passed out from drink.
It comes to the lover, to the dog chewing
a sock, to the pusher, to the basket maker,
and to the clerk stacking cans of carrots
in the night.

It even comes to the boulder
in the perpetual shade of pine barrens,
to rain falling on the open sea,
to the wineglass, weary of holding wine.


I must contemplate some more.




April is the cruellest month, breeding


Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing


Memory and desire, stirring


Dull roots with spring rain.


Winter kept us warm, covering


Earth in forgetful snow, feeding


A little life with dried tubers.


Summer surprised us, coming over the Starnbergersee


With a shower of rain; we stopped in the colonnade,


And went on in sunlight, into the Hofgarten,


And drank coffee, and talked for an hour.






-
quoted from T.S. Eliot's The Waste Land.











If you're a regular at my blog, you'll know that I love poetry. I enjoy posting poems here and sharing them with my readers as well as reading poems on other blogs. I've gotten some great feedback on my posts and I am happy you are all enjoying discovering new poets.



April (even though it's almost over) is actually National Poetry Month.


Inaugurated by the Academy of American Poets in 1996, National Poetry Month is now held every April, when publishers, booksellers, literary organizations, libraries, schools and poets around the country band together to celebrate poetry and its vital place in American culture.



Read more at Poets.org and while you're there, browse the site and maybe check out a poem or two.



Among my many favorites are Neruda, Frost, Angelou, Dickinson, Shakespeare, Lowell and Hughes. Who are your favorite poets?



Check out the Savvy Verse & Wit blog where Serena is promoting poetry and poets.



Why have I now become interested in what Richard Dawkins has to say?

I have always admired and quoted him in many of my posts. I had failed to read any of his works due to lack of time and money to purchase the books…and he has many.




This holiday I received a gift from my youngest daughter and it was “Richard Dawkins, The Oxford Book of Modern Science Writing” I couldn’t have been more delighted. I was actually craving one of his books, wanting to read something intelligent and compelling…of which there is so little out there.


After sleeping through a hundred million centuries
we have finally opened our eyes on a sumptuous planet,
sparkling with color, bountiful with life. Within decades
we must close our eyes again. Isn’t it a noble, an enlightened
way of spending our brief time in the sun, to work at
understanding the universe and how we have come to wake up in it?
This is how I answer when I am asked . . . why I bother to get up in the mornings.

-- Richard Dawkins

PHOTO SOURCE: http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.nndb.com/people/281/000024209/dawkins.


Tuesday, April 26, 2011

How long did you think Keith Olbermann was going to be silenced?

It was announced that on June 20th of this year ,

"The show will combine familiar and popular features with some new elements that we can't wait to unveil," said Mark Rosenthal, CEO of Current, in a statement. "We're creating a great platform for Keith's style, which includes a very sophisticated digital presence for him—that we think will appeal to his very enthusiastic and active following. The show will also appeal to new viewers tuning into Keith for the first time."

SOURCE: Jed Lewison, http://www.dailykos.com/



This week's movie rental was Tron: Legacy, a 2010 science fiction film starring Jeff Bridges, Bruce Boxleitner, and Garrett Hedlund. The film is a sequel to the 1982 sci fi movie Tron. Basic set-up/plot from Wikipedia ...

In 1989, Kevin Flynn (Jeff Bridges), an innovative software engineer and the CEO of ENCOM International, disappears. Twenty years later, his son, Sam (Garrett Hedlund), who became ENCOM's controlling shareholder after his father's disappearance, takes little interest in the company besides an annual practical joke on the board of directors. Sam is visited by his father's friend and ENCOM executive Alan Bradley (Bruce Boxleitner), who urges Sam to investigate a mysterious page originating from Flynn's old arcade. While exploring the shuttered arcade, Sam discovers a concealed computer laboratory and unintentionally transports himself to the Grid, a virtual world inside the computer.



Sam finds his father within the Grid and wants them both to fight their way out of what's become a coded evil empire ruled by CLU, a digital copy of Kevin Flynn, but Sam's father, who's created himself a Buddhist-like dwelling complete with go board, surprises Sam by being emotionally detached ...

Kevin: The only way to win is not to play.

Sam: That's a hell of a way to live.

Kevin: But it is a way.

Sam: We can go home. Don't you want that?

Kevin: Sometimes life has a way of moving you past things like wants and hopes.

Sam: That's great Dad. Keep telling yourself that.

(later, when Sam's convinced his father to care enough to fight)

Kevin: You're messing with my zen thing, man.

I hate detachment :)

I have to admit that while the movie had some nice special effects, I was pretty disappointed in the storyline. The parts I liked best were the little dog that belonged to Sam - Boston Terrier, Marv :) .....



And Bruce Boxleitner (of Babylon 5 fame) who sadly only had a small role in the film .....



Roger Ebert liked the movie better than I did and gave it three out of our stars.




title: Memoirs Of Fanny Hill

author: John Cleland

genre: erotica/classic

pages: 106

published: 1749

first line: I sit down to give you an undeniable proof of my considering your desires as indispensable orders.

rated: naughty/X-rated





Memoirs Of Fanny Hill
has been called the first pornographic book and it is one of the most banned books ever.


I stumbled upon Memoirs Of Fanny Hill on my iTouch Classic Books app. Would I consider it a classic? I'd consider it classic porn, which is a genre I've never read.




The story is written in two parts. In the first part of the story we get to know Frances Hill and how she became a prostitute at a young age. She was born to a poor family in Liverpool. At age fifteen, both her parents died of smallpox.
She was brought to London by a family friend and is abandoned there.
Fanny is looking to work as a housemaid and stumbles unknowingly upon a whorehouse run by a Mrs. Brown who takes Fanny in and tells her her 'maidenhead' will fetch a good price.





On Fanny's first night, she has a sexual encounter with her female roommate.

Every part of me was open and exposed to the licentious courses of her hands, which, like a lambent fire, ran over my whole body, and thawed all coldness as they went.





After narrowly escaping being raped by a paying customer, Fanny is happy to be under Mrs. Browns care. Some time passes and she is told what is expected of her, the details of what she is to do with clients are explained to her by the rest of her housemates. She is afraid of sex at first, but after peeping in on a few couples having sex, Fanny can hardly wait to try it herself with a man.




Fanny unexpectedly meets Charles, a young man who is well-off, and he offers to take her away with him. She leaves the brothel with Charles the next day. She later refers to him as her Adonis and the sweet relenting murderer of my virginity.


Once Charles steps into the story, there are some romantic scenes as Fanny actually falls in love with him. Doesn't this sound like something out of the romance novels written today?

Charles had just slipped the bolt of the door, and running, caught me in his arms, and lifting me from the ground, with his lips glued to mine, bore me trembling, panting, dying with soft fears and tender wishes, to the bed; where his impatience would not suffer him to undress me, more than just unpinning my handkerchief and gowns, and unlacing my stays.




When Charles unexpectedly leaves Fanny, she is left three months pregnant, heartbroken and with no money.

Fanny continues to live the life of a prostitute, but as time passes, she becomes smarter. In the second half of the story we see a more experienced Fanny. By the end of the story, she is nineteen years old.




Throughout the book she recollects her many lovers and sexual encounters. There is plenty of sex in the plot. Same sex partners, light bondage and lashings, to a full-on orgy are all in the storyline. Voyeurism was a sort of past-time for a few of the characters in this story, they always seemed to find a peep-hole available. It's all very scandalous and shocking, especially considering this book was written in 1749. (way before my beloved Pride & Prejudice)




This was a spicy read, even by today's standards. I'm surprised that he wrote the story without any outright vile language.


I found the writing to be well done. John Cleland would definitely give some erotic fiction writers a run for their money. However, I did laugh at some of the word use. The author uses the funniest names while referring to the male form. The engine of love assaults, enormous machine, IT, staff of love and object of terror and delight, just to name a few.



He describes female pubic hair as the richest sable fur in the universe. I'm sorry, but I laughed out loud while reading that!



Like I said, some of the writing was really good, the sex scenes went on and on.
Here's an example:

Then began the driving tumult on his side, and the responsive heaves on mine, which kept me up to him; whilst, as our joys grew too great for utterance, the organs of our voices, voluptuously intermixing, became organs of the touch... how delicious!... how poignantly luscious!... And now! now I felt, to the heart of me! I felt the prodigious keen edge, with which love, presiding over this act, points the pleasure: love! that may be styled the Attic salt of enjoyment; and indeed, without it, the joy, great as it is, is still a vulgar one, whether in a king or a beggar; for it is, undoubtedly, love alone that refines, ennobles, and exalts it.





All in all, this was an unexpected read for me and I enjoyed it enough to keep reading. I finished it in two sittings. It was bawdy and scandalous and I did wonder what would become of Fanny.



I read that author John Cleland and the publishers and printer of Fanny Hill were arrested shortly after publication. The novel of course, continued to sell in pirated forms. Sex does sell, no matter what century we're in.



Lifted then to the utmost pitch of joy that human life can bear, undestroyed by excess, I touched that sweetly critical point, whence scarce prevented by the injection from my partner, I dissolved, and breaking out into a deep drawn sigh, sent my whole sensitive soul down to that passage where escape was denied it, by its being so deliciously plugged and choked up.








 

FREE HOT BODYPAINTING | HOT GIRL GALERRY