Monday, April 4, 2011



title: Immortal Obsession

author: Denise K. Rago

pages: 267

genre: paranormal romance

published: 2010

source: sent for review by author

first line: Thick, billowing smoke filled the Louise XVI apartment as flames climbed the brocade drapes, spreading from the valance to the ceiling.

rated:

4 out of 5 stars





Christian Du Mauré impulsively follows his best friend into the complex, warring underworld of Parisian vampires. Against the fiery backdrop of the French Revolution, Christian's life is changed forever following an affair with a mortal artistocrat—for when he promises to watch over her daughter, she reveals the child is his.

More than 200 years later, in modern-day Manhattan, only two descendants of the star-crossed union remain. After one of them witnesses a savage murder in Central Park, she becomes determined to find the ethereal stranger who saved her life.



When their worlds inevitably collide, Christian finds he cannot prevent Amanda, his unwitting descendant, from becoming a pawn in a centuries-old struggle for power.


As a confrontation between ancient enemies comes to a head, Christian must finally face an unspeakable betrayal from his past—for himself, and the woman he loves.




When author Denise K. Rago contacted me about a possible book review I happily accepted. I enjoy both romance and vampires and was curious to read this book especially since it has both Paris and New York as settings within the plot.

The vampire Christian Du Mauré loses his married mortal artistocrat lover Josette during the French Revolution. Before she dies, she reveals to Christian that her daughter, Solange, is really his child and makes him swear to care for her always.







Fast forward two centuries later, in modern day New York, where Christian lives with his best friend Michel. When they were mortals, Christian and Michel were inseparable. When Michel was turned vampire by his lover, he bit Christian soon after.


The two vampires now own a club in the city called the Grey Wolf. Christian gave Solange up as a child to be raised in London. She has always resented him for that and felt he abandoned her. This resentment has fueled a rage inside her. She too was turned vampire.


Siblings Amanda Perretti and her brother Ryan are descendants of Solange's line.
Ryan is a drug addict that sells his blood to vampires in return for money to buy his next fix. Word has it that his blood is special, the vampire who drinks it will be able to walk in broad daylight.


Amanda has always been fascinated by the French Revolution, and works in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. When she witnesses her brother killed before her very eyes, she also sees Christian for the first time when he steps in and saves her life from the vampire that killed her brother. Though heartbroken and mortified, she cannot get the image of Christian out of her mind. When she runs into him six months later, she is drawn to him.

In a strange way, her brother's murder had taken control of her life. It was as horrific as it was beguiling, and now she had met one of the cast of characters: Christian. Although he seemed staid and polite, he was dark and alluring as well. She felt drawn to him like a magnet.
p.94



Christian knows Amanda is a descendant of Solange's, and he feels he must protect her. However, when he begins to put pieces of the puzzle together, he wonders whether his mortal lover Josette was hiding something from him all those years ago.
He finds himself unable to resist Amanda. Since her blood is so unique, her life is now in danger.




As soon as I began reading Immortal Obsession I was easily swept into the storyline.
I really liked the modern day New York setting, this being one of my favorite places I could easily visualize the sights and sounds of the city.





I like Denise K. Rago's vampires, they remind me of Anne Rice's immortals, with their beauty and seductiveness. The love story within the book was interesting and I kept wondering when and if Christian and Amanda would get together. I liked Christian and how he still kept a shred of humanity within himself.
There is also a very strong bond between Christian and Michel, and the two are like soulmates.



Amanda painfully reminded him of being young and vulnerable. She seemed angry at the world, which he understood, and constantly denied her need for people. She reminded him that human suffering was timeless, something that hundreds of years and immortal powers could not abate. The feeling of an eternal emptiness, of knowing he was only temporarily sating a need that could never be satisfied by sex or blood alone. The instincts of being immortal ruled him, but a nameless, faceless emptiness filled him up and twisted his stomach into knots.
p.178





If you're in the mood for a good romance with paranormal aspects, I recommend Immortal Obsession. This is Denise K. Rago's debut novel, and I hope to read more of her work someday. She leaves the ending wide open for a sequel.



Special thanks to Denise for sending me a copy of her book, she's a really sweet lady. She did a guest post at my blog this past February where she discussed the Subtle Art of Romance Writing.


Visit her website here: http://www.denisekrago.com/



*photo credit*

the picture above is taken from the authors website.





Yet, what the Republican-Teahadists are doing is worse than that

Of course, they don’t admit it nor will they say that the class war began with President Reagan and it has snowballed to a crushing avalanche on the middle class and the poor. The wealthy keeps getting obscenely rich and the poor much poorer, I mean, dirt-poor-living under the bridge poor and the middle class has been systematically decimated. If the tax cuts for the rich and the corporations under the premise that it would TRICKLE DOWN have caused a major disruption of our lives and a dismal economic situation; you wouldn’t know it by listening to the Republicans and their pundits. It is not just that they refuse to own it; it is that they want not just more of the same but a hell of a lot more of the same.

Our fragile economy can’t stand any more of this pillage and plunder of its wealth by the very few on top of the food chain; something has to give and I am afraid it is going to have to be the rich and the corporations because the poor and the middle class have nothing more to give, nothing else to lose, nothing to look forward to except a life of semi-slavery and misery. Poverty is no fun and it is particularly disturbing when there is so much wealth. One could understand that in a poor country, a third world one you could see vast amounts of poor people; but not in the greatest nation in the world…it is not in keeping with our values, our expectations and the pursuit of happiness that our Founding Fathers so vehemently wanted for our nation.

Sunday, April 3, 2011



The Sunday Salon.com







It's Sunday, the weather is beautiful and I've been reading alot this past week.
Coming up this week is my long due review of Denise K. Rago's paranormal romance called Immortal Obsession, which I really enjoyed and am eager to share my thoughts on it with all of you.




I've been recently invited to join Amazon Vine, which is a cool program where you chose 2 products a month for free as long as you review them on Amazon afterwards. Kind of like Librarything, only Amazon's program includes non bookish products as well. Of course, this past month I couldn't resist the books, so I requested America Pacifica (dystopian/science fiction) and Those That Wake (science fiction/horror). Both arrived already and are ARC's which I'm very eager to delve into.








I'm off now to catch up on reviews and do some blog hopping.

What are you all up to? Enjoy your Sunday :)


I'll leave you all with a little Ray Lamontagne today. I just love him.









Cuban Independence War Patriot José Martí, hero, poet and philosopher said: “countries have the governments they deserve”

There is no argument about the 2010 elections; as President Obama described them “we got shellacked”. But there is a very compelling argument that says that a good chunk of the American people is not just misguided but they suffer from collective amnesia.

We had just entered into the biggest economic crisis since the Great Depression and there is no argument that the Republicans are to blame for it…yes, take should take the frickin’ blame, because of their pervasive elimination of regulations, because of the tax cuts for the very rich and because all the subsidies and breaks the big corporations got. They don’t want to take ownership of the mess and they will not even attempt at fixing the problem…on the contrary; they are working feverishly to sabotage the Obama Presidency so that he is a one term Commander in Chief. They have said so and we have seen their actions in the past two years: obstruct, delay, lie, exaggerate and worst of all, use uncivil, vitriolic personal attacks on the President and all Democrats.

Having that out of the way, and I dare anybody argue differently and convince me otherwise, I still don’t understand how a good chunk of the American people was sold a bill of goods, was bamboozled into voting Republican in 2010. They neglected to see in their myopic outlook who really caused their misery and who has to take responsibility for the economic mess and two wars, one of which America became engaged in it by being told lies by their government.

Still, these people were told over and over “you can’t expect to get different results if you apply the same old, tired principles. Please don’t tell me about “government is the problem and government doesn’t work, it is too big and “TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS” is swell. I will not buy it and by now, a good many who voted Republican in the 2010 elections are having buyer’s remorse.

How can we even contemplate giving tax cuts for the very wealthy and the corporations and turn around and stick the middle class and the poor with the shortfall, the lack of revenue? How could some of these Teahadist-Republicans who are not super wealthy, actually the great majority of them don’t have a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of…how can they, what were they thinking when they voted Republican?

I think that Dave Johnson puts it very well in his March 25, 2011 article:

Did American Workers "Get What They Deserved?"

Dave Johnson

What did people expect would happen when they voted for Reagan, Bush and other conservatives, or supported their policies? In the Holland (Michigan) Sentinel community columnist Ray Buursma writes, American workers got what they deserved. Some of the things he says might resonate with many of us,

Remember the Reagan standard? Are you better off today than you were a decade ago? Two decades? Three? Unless you make more than $380,000 a year, the answer is no. In fact, your standard of living over the last quarter century has actually decreased while millionaires have added 30 percent to their net wealth. Why? Two reasons.

First, hundreds of thousands of manufacturing jobs went overseas while the politicians you elected did nothing to stop them. Yet you continue to elect leaders who offer nothing but tax cuts, as if that would stem the flow of disappearing jobs.

Did you demand your leaders address America’s trade imbalance or continuous outsourcing of jobs? Did you demand your leaders require foreign countries to buy a dollar’s worth of American goods for every dollar of goods they sell here?

No and no. You didn’t bother.

Buursma writes that instead of resenting people who make more because they are in a union, people should join a union and fight for your job, wages and benefits. He continues,

Maybe you’re thinking, “I’m not a union worker, so this doesn’t affect me.”

Stop being stupid. Union benefits provide a standard other companies have to match, or at least come close to. When those benefits are cut, yours are, too. Or do you think you operate in your own little employment vacuum?

Agree or disagree, please click through and read his entire piece.

Whose Fault?

There is no question that things are not going the way they should be going. We see decline all around us -- all pointing back to the changes made after the election of Ronald Reagan. Tax cuts led to massive debt. Deregulation led to mine, oil and financial disasters that cost us more than deregulation ever saved. The infrastructure is crumbling. It seems like we are entering third-world status.

So is it the fault of American workers that their wages and benefits have declined as jobs are shipped overseas?

I don't blame working people. After all, they're working! So they're busy, and stressed, and focused on work. They can't be expected to keep up with the little details and facts and nuances -- especially when they are attacked daily with a barrage of well-funded and professionally crafted corporate/conservative propaganda!

This assault on information and truth has been going on for decades. Under Reagan there was a dramatic shift toward "market" -- one-dollar-one-vote -- sources of information and away from objective, citizen-oriented democratic -- one-person-one-vote -- sources. This market-sourced information necessarily reflects a conservative/corporate view because it is driven by money and profit instead of humanity and humanity's needs.

Information for Democracy!

How do we counter the corporate/conservative assault on truth? One answer to the problem of getting accurate, objective information is to use (and support) alternative sources that are not offered by the conservative/corporate machine. Here is a list of a few links to alternative news sources. Please send these to relatives, friends, and even post them to conservative forums.

PHOTO SOURCE: http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://blog.usw.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/dave-johnson.

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Ladybugs

I noticed some ladybugs on the aphid-infested rosebush. Took 23 photos and two turned out sort of ok :)

A little pile of them -


At the bottom of the leaf you can also see a tiny spider -



I saw in the news that there's a new tv series - Camelot - about the King Arthur legend. Most (all?) the actors are from the UK, I think, and I only recognized one - Joseph Fiennes as Merlin.

I've been intrigued by Camelot since reading The Once and Future King and I've seen a number of movies about the Arthur legend (you can see a complete list of all the films/tv series about him here). Most were a bit disappointing :) but still I thought I'd mention them ....

The oldest one I've seen was the 1967 Camelot, which I picked up from the library and posted about in 2008 here.. It starred Richard Harris as King Arthur, Vanessa Redgrave as Guenevere, Franco Nero as Lancelot, and David Hemmings as Mordred, and was directed by Joashua Logan. Sadly, Merlin was not really in the film except as a remembered flash-back. Here's Harris as Arthur ...



There was the 1981 Excalibur, starred Nigel Terry as Arthur, Nicholas Clay as Lancelot, Helen Mirren as Morgana, Liam Neeson as Gawain, Nicol Williamson as Merlin and a relatively unknown Patrick Stewart as Leondegrance. (and Gabriel Byrne as Uther Pendragon). I know I saw this but don't really remember much of it. There are two versions - one PG, the other R.

Then there was the 1995 First Knight which I caught on tv. It starred Sean Connery as King Arthur, Richard Gere as Lancelot, and Julia Ormond as Guinevere. Didn't like it much.

Also on tv, the 1998 miniseries Merlin It starred Sam Neill as Merlin, Miranda Richardson as Queen Mab and also the Lady of the Lake, Isabella Rossellini as Merlin's girlfriend/nemesis Nimue, Martin Short played a gnome :), Rutger Hauer played Vortigern, and Helena Bonham Carter was Morgan le Fay. I actually kind of liked this one, except that Sam Neill seems so un-Merlini-ish. I especially liked the ending.

The last movie I've seen on the subject was the 2004 King Arthur. This one was actually pretty interesting, at least in its choice of actors and storyline. I posted about it in 2008. Here's a bit from that post, King Arthur, student of Pelagius :) ......


- Clive Owen as King Arthur

Last night's rental movie was the 2004 film King Arthur. It had an unusual cast ... Clive Owen as Arthur, Ioan Gruffudd as Lancelot, Stellan Skarsgård as Cerdic the Saxon, Mads Mikkelsen as Tristan, and Ivano Marescotti as St. Germanus of Auxerre, among others.

[The movie's] producers said it was based on new archaeological findings and was more historically accurate.

I don't know about that, but the storyline did differ in many ways, and it has some interesting twists .... Merlin, for instance, is not Arthur's wizard tutor, but the leader of the Pictish tribes who were being pushed to the north and west, called "Woads" in the film (because they used woad to dye their skin, I'd guess), and Guinevere, Merlin's daughter, is pretty good with a bow and arrow, I suppose a take on Boudica. Galahad isn't Lancelot's son - in fact, all the knights of the round table are in this movie said to be Sarmatians who are serving 15 years indentured servitude to Rome in Britain.


- Tristan and his hawk

One kind of interesting part is that they show Arthur, a Roman soldier of British/Roman ancestory, as a student of Pelagius and his doctrine of free will ( St. Germanus, appearing in the movie, was one of his real life detractors). Here's a little of what Wikipedia has to say about him ...

Pelagius (ca. 354 – ca. 420/440) was an ascetic monk and reformer who denied the doctrine of original sin, later developed by Augustine of Hippo, inherited from Adam and was declared a heretic by the Roman Catholic Church. His interpretation of a doctrine of free will became known as Pelagianism. He was well educated, fluent in both Greek and Latin, and learned in theology. He spent time as an ascetic, focusing on practical asceticism, which his teachings clearly reflect. He was not, however, a cleric. He was certainly well known in Rome, both for the harsh asceticism of his public life as well as the power and persuasiveness of his speech. His reputation in Rome earned him praise early in his career even from such pillars of the Church as Augustine, who referred to him as a "saintly man." However, he was later accused of lying about his own teachings in order to avoid public condemnation. Most of his later life was spent defending himself against other theologians and the Catholic Church ..... After being banished from Rome, Pelagius headed east. He probably died in Palestine around 420, as reported by some. Others mention him living as many as twenty years later. The cause of his death is unknown, but it has been suggested that he was killed by his enemies in the Catholic Church.

Though the movie had its downsides - a hinky dialogue, a misrepresentation of Pelagianism, a bizarre mix of weapons and armour, showing all the Christians as rather venal and the Saxons as unredeemably evil with Cedric such a sociopath, he made my skin crawl - still it was entertaining ... the Picts were sort of freedom fighters that we came to embrace, there was a pretty nice scene with a fight on a frozen lake, the Battle of Mons Badonicus was not too bad, and the scenery, shot in Ireland, was beautiful.


- Cynric and his dad Cerdic with their Saxon horde.


She called her adoring fans to come together for a rally and she didn’t even get one hundred people to attend.

With the latest budget showdown looming next week, Rep. Michele Bachmann said Thursday that she’s looking for a fight.

“We’ve never said we want to see government shut down," Bachmann told reporters before speaking at a Tea Party rally outside the U.S. Capitol. "What we want is a true fight — we truly want to fight to cut government spending.”

But one has to be rolling on the floor laughing at the number of people who attended her rally. It is not just laughable, it is downright pitiful. Well, pity is the last thing to come to my mind when dealing with an abrasive, irrational, incompetent and ignorant politician. We should all feel sorry for her but we don’t.

This is what Rubin, a Michele Bachmann fan had to say:

“Bachmann’s greatest challenge, should she run for president in 2012, will be to convince a wide cross-section of voters that she isn’t the media’s cartoon figure. But she’ll have to do it without dampening the enthusiasm of her most devoted supporters. However, candidly, the biggest challenge will be for the other candidates, who will have to debate a very smart, articulate and entirely underestimated woman. As one Republican operative told me, “Hey, I wouldn’t want to get on that stage with her.” And that is precisely why a Bachmann candidacy, far from being a “joke” or a “farce,” might be the most interesting thing to happen to the 2012 GOP primary race.”

She's far from being a joke or a farce exactly the way Sarah Palin is far from a joke or a farce. After all, that anyone with such little intellectual heft and qualification can be lauded as a potential Presidential candidate is no laughing matter. One has to wonder what measuring stick these people are using to determine Bachmann’s intelligence or Sarah Palin’s for that matter. Time and time again these two have demonstrated a general lack of knowledge in most matters that would be crucial if elected President of the United States.

PHOTO SOURCE: http://www.startribune.com/politics/blogs/119011394.html

SOURCE: http://www.dailykos.com/

 

FREE HOT BODYPAINTING | HOT GIRL GALERRY