|
|---|
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Dear Reader,
The extraordinary claim that explosives and/or jet fuel are what destroyed the towers on 9/11 is scientifically inaccurate. It is comparable to charging a murder suspect for 'stabbing the victim with a knife', despite the fact that numerous bullet casings had been found at the crime scene and the murder victim actually had multiple gunshot wounds. There is a thing called Double Jeopardy in our legal system, so we only get one shot at charging the true suspects, and thus, we better figure out exactly how they did it before we charge them. We can do this by analyzing the physical evidence from 9/11.
To this day, the only researcher who has put forth a scientific conclusion which explains all the easily verifiable physical evidence, is Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D (Materials Science Engineering). If anyone can explain the physical evidence better than Dr. Judy Wood has, please let me know, for I am more than willing to consider an alternative scientific explanation if it can successfully account for all the evidence.
The extraordinary claim that explosives and/or jet fuel are what destroyed the towers on 9/11 is scientifically inaccurate. It is comparable to charging a murder suspect for 'stabbing the victim with a knife', despite the fact that numerous bullet casings had been found at the crime scene and the murder victim actually had multiple gunshot wounds. There is a thing called Double Jeopardy in our legal system, so we only get one shot at charging the true suspects, and thus, we better figure out exactly how they did it before we charge them. We can do this by analyzing the physical evidence from 9/11.
To this day, the only researcher who has put forth a scientific conclusion which explains all the easily verifiable physical evidence, is Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D (Materials Science Engineering). If anyone can explain the physical evidence better than Dr. Judy Wood has, please let me know, for I am more than willing to consider an alternative scientific explanation if it can successfully account for all the evidence.
In 2007, Dr. Judy Wood filed several legal cases against the corporations NIST had contracted to conduct the 9/11 "investigations", many of which are military / defense / weapons organizations involved in Directed Energy research (huge conflict-of-interest). The filings in these legal cases included Requests For Corrections (RFC) based on the Data Quality Act, and Qui Tam whistle-blower cases. One of her legal cases made it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court in October of 2009. John Hutchison has filed an affidavit in Dr. Wood's court case, to legally testify to the numerous similarities between The Hutchison Effect and the 9/11 attacks. Surprisingly, Dr. Judy Wood is the only 9/11 researcher who has submitted evidence to the courts in pursuit of the truth. She has been actively pursuing 9/11 Truth with her lawyer, despite the lack of support she has received from Dr. Steven Jones and other members of the 9/11 Truth community. The legal documents from her court cases can be viewed at the following links:
1.
2.
The following information is a small fraction of the important physical evidence which must be explained. Dr. Judy Wood has literally gathered thousands of photos, graphs, videos, and documents in her analysis (with virtually every source provided), so this is just a tiny sample of the data shared on her book (
The USGS discovered that the WTC dust which blanketed NYC contained a significant quantity of these unique nano-sized iron-rich microspheres. What could have caused these unique iron-rich microspheres to form? What can transform steel buildings into nano-scale, iron-rich, microspheric dust? (Steel is mainly iron and carbon) Source:
Thousands of photos, graphs, videos, and documents, all which must be explained:
Based on what we know from previous building collapses and controlled demolitions, the rubble pile of each WTC Twin Tower should have been at least 12% (13 stories) of the building's original height (110 stories), yet the actual rubble pile that resulted was less than 3 stories tall. What could have caused this? The following video explains this fact more clearly:
What Turned the Twin Towers to DUST on 9/11?
The WTC buildings were transformed to dust so fine that a large portion of it floated high up into our atmosphere (if you look closely, you can also see the small black plume of smoke rising from the debris). What could transform a steel building into dust this fine, while warping and burning aluminum, yet leaving paper and plastic virtually unharmed? Why did the dust stay in a column until it reached a certain point in our atmosphere at which it finally began diffusing?
Thousands of photos, graphs, videos, and documents, all which must be explained:
Why was there only one metal file cabinet found in the rubble of the WTC towers? Why were metal door knobs virtually non-existent in the debris pile as well? Only one metal file cabinet of thousands survived the 'collapse' of two of the largest office buildings in the world? Why did the metal of this single surviving file cabinet show severe distortion/warping that is characteristic of the metal distortion/warping seen in The Hutchison Effect experiments? Why were there pieces of paper fused to the metal inside this remaining file cabinet, yet the paper was unburnt? Furthermore, why were numerous intact plastic ID cards found in the rubble? How did numerous plastic ID cards survive the 'collapses', yet thousands of metal file cabinets and door knobs did not? The following video explains these facts more clearly:
Relics from the Dust | Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) & 9/11
Even the mainstream media has acknowledged that steel and marble from the WTC buildings were transformed into very fine dust. They appear to be quite confused about it, which is very understandable:
Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Full Clip) | ABC News http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJb-GPtb2I0
Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFP9lj32EvM
Why were there statistically significant magnetosphere readings in Alaska at the very same time of the 9/11 attacks? Why were the 6 University of Alaska magnetometer stations detecting normal readings for days before 9/11, when there was suddenly a huge electromagnetic disturbance in the Earth's magnetosphere precisely as the attacks occurred? What could have caused this? (You may have to scroll to the right to see the peaks) Source:
Thousands of photos, graphs, videos, and documents, all which must be explained:
Below, I have listed some other important pieces of evidence which must be explained. This list is just a small fraction of the thousands of photos, graphs, videos, and documents which Dr. Judy Wood has gathered, which most certainly are not explained by jetfuel and/or explosives of any kind. Please consider the following evidence-based questions:
• How come most of the Twin Towers’ steel and concrete was transformed into a fine dust, while large quantities of aluminum exhibited strange electrical warping and burns, yet paper was unharmed? Extreme heat from jet fuel (or explosives) does not selectively damage certain materials, so how come some materials turned to dust, while other materials were bent or burnt, and yet other materials were completely unharmed?
• Why was Hurricane Erin travelling straight for NYC from September 7th-11th 2001, yet it was not reported on by local media broadcasts in that area in the days leading up to 9/11? When local news channels displayed schematic maps of the northeast coastline, why was Hurricane Erin not shown? Hurricane Erin was slightly larger than Hurricane Katrina, and hurricanes rarely head straight for NYC, so why wasn’t it reported on and/or shown by local media outlets? Hurricane Erin reached its closest point to NYC on the morning of September 11th. After the 9/11 attacks, Erin made a sudden ~150° turn away from its straight-line path and headed back out to sea.
• Why were there statistically significant magnetosphere readings in Alaska at the very same time of the 9/11 attacks? Why were the 6 University of Alaska magnetometer stations detecting normal readings for many days before 9/11, when suddenly, there was a huge electromagnetic disturbance in the Earth's magnetosphere precisely as the attacks occurred?
• Why do official seismograph readings around ground zero show smaller ground vibrations in comparison to the controlled demolition of the King Dome, which is a smaller building? Shouldn’t the smaller building have generated a smaller seismographic reading than the WTC buildings? Or perhaps the smaller reading of the WTC buildings came about because they were turned to fine particles of dust, as the evidence shows?
• How come there are many reports of power outages and electrical failures in the areas surrounding ground zero just as the attacks commenced?
• Why were numerous first responders’ Scott packs (oxygen tanks) spontaneously exploding around ground zero?
• How were the Twin Towers turned to dust so fine, that the dust floated high up into our atmosphere. The satellite photos show a clear distinction between the black smoke and the whitish-grey dust, so what turned such a large portion of these buildings to dust so fine that it floated high into our atmosphere?
Lobby for quick frame of reference; note the distinct columns around the lobby's perimeter, these are roughly 3 stories tall
Where did the building go? Seconds earlier, there was one of the world's largest office buildings standing here (notice the ambulance which was parked on the street; also note the distinct columns from the WTC lobby). What caused this? (You may have to scroll to the right to see the rest of the image)
Thousands of photos, graphs, videos, and documents, all which must be explained:
• How come 1,400+ vehicles located several blocks away (some up to ¼ a mile away) from ground zero experienced metal warping and electricity-like burns and holes during the attacks? If you think the building debris caused these things, then how come that same debris did not burn the clothing or skin of the nearby pedestrians it covered?
• How come countless vehicles located several blocks away from ground zero were flipped upside down or on their side, next to trees which still had all of their leaves on them?
• How come several steel beams were observed to be bent and/or shriveled up in very unusual ways, ways which have only been observed during The Hutchison Effect experiments?
• Why were no toilets recovered from the small WTC rubble pile? Thousands of toilets, yet not a single one was found in the rubble?
• Why was only one file cabinet found in the small WTC rubble pile? Thousands of metal file cabinets, yet only one was found? The metal from the cabinet showed severe warping and distortion, similar to that seen in The Hutchison Effect, so how did this happen? Furthermore, how were their non-burnt pieces of paper found fused to the metal remnants of the single file cabinet?
• How did countless pieces of paper money survive the WTC attacks? Toilets and metal file cabinets do not survive, but countless intact paper bills survived?
• How did countless plastic photo IDs survive the WTC attacks? Toilets and metal file cabinets do not survive, but countless plastic ID cards survived?
How is this steel turning to dust in midair? The smaller pieces in the air are aluminum cladding from the exterior of the building, but the large slabs/grids turning to dust towards the bottom of the image are steel. What can transform steel to fine dust in mid air? Please see this video clip of the 'collapse' (dustification) in slow motion: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dueVm1UGvXo
Thousands of photos, graphs, videos, and documents, all which must be explained:
• How come spontaneous rusting of materials occurred all around ground zero? In some instances, entire front-halves of cars were rusted, while the back-halves appeared to be virtually untouched?
• How come various debris at ground zero was still observed to be fuming and being hosed down well into 2008, as video evidence clearly shows? Do fires last for 7+ years? Do debris from fires need to be hosed down 7 years later?
• How come circular holes were observed in the windows of virtually all the buildings near ground zero, when holes like these are known only to be caused by longitudinal waves of energy? If building debris smashed the windows, they would have shattered in a predictable way, so how come these countless windows did not shatter, but instead, developed circular holes characteristic of the effect of longitudinal waves of energy on glass?
• How was the ‘bathtub’, the area directly beneath the Twin Towers, left virtually unharmed? How could thousands of tons of falling building debris not damage the ‘bathtub’ beneath the WTC buildings?
• How was the ‘Looney Toons’ gift shop in the basement of the WTC buildings left virtually unharmed, so dramatically that the ‘Bugs Bunny’ statue and other statues were not even scratched or dented? How could these figurines survive thousands of tons of falling building debris?
• How was the PATH Train beneath the WTC buildings left virtually unharmed? Shouldn’t falling building debris have crushed that train, or at the very least, knocked it off the tracks?
• How could thousands of tons of rapidly falling steel and concrete building debris leave the ‘Bath Tub’, the basement gift shops, and the PATH train, virtually unharmed? Shouldn’t thousands of tons of falling steel and concrete cause significant damage to at least one of these?
How is this steel turning to dust in midair? The smaller pieces in the air are aluminum cladding from the exterior of the building, but the large slab being turned to dust towards the bottom of the image is steel. Please see this video clip of the 'collapse' (dustification) in slow motion: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dueVm1UGvXo
Thousands of photos, graphs, videos, and documents, all which must be explained:
• How come Dr. Wood has already filed evidence-based legal cases against suspected 9/11-involved defense and weapons companies based on their conflict-of-interest relationship with N.I.S.T., yet other 9/11 “truth” researchers have not? How come Dr. Steven Jones has not officially filed his scientific ‘peer-reviewed’ nano-thermite evidence with Congress or the U.S. Courts?
• Why are groups like AE911Truth and PilotsFor911Truth just now claiming to be “pursuing a new 9/11 investigation” when Dr. Judy Wood has already filed many legal cases to pursue such an investigation, one which was successfully appealed to the level of the U.S. Supreme Court in October 2009?
• Why did Dr. Jones ban Dr. Wood from his ‘Scholars for 9/11 Truth’ group long ago, just because they had different conclusions about what destroyed the towers? Shouldn’t Dr. Jones and his ‘Scholars for 9/11 Truth’ group be supporting the 9/11 investigation that Dr. Judy Wood has already demanded with her legal cases, even if he does not agree with her conclusions?
• Why was I silently removed from the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) petition simply for asking Richard Gage if he would examine the research of Dr. Judy Wood? Why didn’t AE911Truth just reply to my well-intended email question, but instead, silently removed me from their petition? I have donated over $100 to AE911Truth, so why was I silently removed from the petition simply for asking Richard Gage a question? Why was I later contacted by Mark Graham of AE911Truth once they discovered I was telling people about what had happened? They could contact me and offer me a refund to try and stop me from telling people about how I was silently removed from their petition, but they couldn’t respond to my email which simply asked Richard Gage if he had looked into Dr. Judy Wood’s research?
Where did the building go? Seconds earlier, there was one of the world's largest office buildings standing here (notice the traffic light which marks street level). What caused this?
Thousands of photos, graphs, videos, and documents, all which must be explained:
• Why was I severely censored when I tried to add Dr. Judy Wood’s name and website to the ‘9/11 Truth Movement’ Wikipedia page? How come David Ray Griffin and other less-qualified researchers are mentioned multiple times on the page, yet I was not even allowed to add one sentence about Dr. Judy Wood? When I tried to appeal the decision, a small group of moderators controlled the discussion and told me that if I appealed it again my account would be locked. According to Wikipedia policy, deletion-appeal discussions are to remain open for public comment and review for 5-7 days before a final decision is made, but my appeal was given a final decision by a small group of rude admins within 12 hours of the onset of my appeal, and the discussion was prematurely closed. After some research, I realized this was a violation of Wikipedia's policy, so I appealed it again, and my account was locked as a result.
• Why did United States Army Major Doug Rokke (retired) spontaneously contact me to try and convince me that explosives were the only things used on 9/11, and to convince me to stop talking about Dr. Judy Wood, yet he never provided any proof to back up his negative accusations against her?
• Why did Soviet Nuclear Intelligent Officer Dimitri Khalezov (retired) spontaneously contact me to try and convince me that underground nuclear explosives were what turned the buildings to fine particles of dust on 9/11, and to convince me to stop talking about Dr. Judy Wood, yet he never provided any significant proof to back up his negative accusations against her?
• Why did these high-ranking retired military officials randomly contact me, an insignificant medical student, when they should be contacting members of the U.S. Congress, and other high-ranking members of our government, with their concerns and the “evidence” they claim to have?
Why was Hurricane Erin travelling straight for NYC from September 7th-11th 2001, yet it was not reported on by local media broadcasts in that area in the days leading up to 9/11? When local news channels displayed schematic maps of the northeast coastline, why was Hurricane Erin not shown? Hurricane Erin was slightly larger than Hurricane Katrina, and hurricanes rarely head straight for NYC, so why wasn’t it reported on and/or shown by local media outlets? Hurricane Erin reached its closest point to NYC on the morning of September 11th, just before it did a ~150° turn away from its straight-line trajectory later that day and headed back out to sea. You can view a compilation of news clips and weather reports from the morning of 9/11, here:
Thousands of photos, graphs, videos, and documents, all which must be explained:
These are just a few pieces of evidence which explosives and/or jetfuel do not account for, but Directed Energy does. Thousands more photos, graphs, videos, and documents can be viewed at Dr. Judy Wood's website, or a brief summary of the evidence can be seen at this 'cliff-notes' style page:
'Dustification' of the remaining steel columns. What could have done this? See a CNN video clip of it here:
Thousands of photos, graphs, videos, and documents, all which must be explained:
As a scientist and medical student, I must rely on verifiable evidence to formulate my opinions. For this reason, I cannot accept the claim that jetfuel and/or explosives are what caused the overwhelming amount of anomalous damage on 9/11, because the evidence does not support those claims. Explosives and/or jetfuel do not explain the physical evidence, but Dr. Judy Wood does, and that is why I support her. She is fighting for all of us.
My intellectual integrity prevents me from calling this a collapse. This is why I have chosen to stand up. My conscience leaves me no other choice. -Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D
Please feel free to copy this post and paste it elsewhere if you feel it is important.
Thanks for your time,
-Abe
Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez
M2 Medical Student
B.S. Biology / Neurobiology
Be skeptical, but don't close your mind.
0 Comments:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
