|
---|
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Last night I posted that the effects changes to Employment Insurance in the mid-90's had a dramatic cost on the auto Industry, the payments for which have now come due. Mere hours later, The National Post hit the street with a front page comment by John Ivison that expands on my thesis.
Significantly about federal government plans to add stimulus through the EI system, Ivison notes:
...he expects the government to create a more level playing field across the country when it comes to who qualifies for EI, so that an unemployed auto worker in Southern Ontario can access the same amount of benefit, for the same length of time, as an unemployed fisherman in Newfoundland. At the moment, Ontario workers are disadvantaged when it comes to coverage and benefit period.
Lets be clear, when Ivison talks about Ontario workers, he means the auto industry.
Now here's what I had to say on EI, just last evening:
Paul Martin balanced the budget in part... on the back of the auto companies, who every party now seems to agree need a bailout...So you see Mr. Harper, I write tomorrow's headlines, today. The perfect candidate for team Harper up in Ottawa. Why would you give a red velvet seat to some Toronto Red Tory?
When Stephen Harper sits down to sort out the EI mess that Paul Martin & The Supremes have just handed him, and Jack Layton calls him to ask what he's doing about the auto jobs, he should look at the changes made to EI that affect the auto companies and consider undoing them.
0 Comments:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)